I
know it is impolite to begin a conversation with a question, but in
this instance I have no choice but to ask, is Trinidad & Tobago
on its way to becoming a police state? On the anniversary of a still
not yet properly explained State of Emergency where the rights of the
citizens were trampled upon for no given or justifiable reason, those
responsible are playing fast and loose with their obligation to the
population and are ignoring the growing calls to explain what exactly
was the thinking behind the move. And the reason I say fast and loose
is that, for something like a State of Emergency to work then certainly the people
have to agree. Imagine the consequences to government if for any
reason the national consensus becomes that the government abused its
power for no good reason, on what would it rely to exercise its
authority in the future? What would be the result if the government
tried to declare another state of emergency and God forbid, the
people refused to comply? See how quickly the ground on which we walk
could become slippery? In a democratic republic where the rule of law
is supreme and the Constitution of the Republic the Supreme Law,
one must always return to the people in whom all power is vested
if not for a fresh mandate then to at least explain your actions when
they appear at odds with the people's will. It is only in
dictatorships, police states and absolute monarchies could the will
of the people be ignored and their concerns easily brushed aside,
but unless there are individuals in the government with royal
delusions, the signs as they exist point in another more sinister
direction.
Minister of Everything Jack Warner's singular decision to
enlarge the police service with first five and now ten thousand
Special Reserve Police officers is troubling and one has to be concerned as to
what exactly is taking place with our democracy. People who
specialize in law enforcement who continue to insist that ours is not a
manpower shortage problem but a manpower management and deployment
problem are being ignored by those with no knowledge whatsoever, and
the belief that the solution lies in an arms race and an escalation
of violence may well further lubricate the landscape with an
inexhaustible supply of blood long before anything even remotely
resembling success could make itself known. Jack's tongue in cheek
calls to police to be more severe with the criminals they encounter
may result in a push back that none of us can envisage at this time,
and in a country that seems more and more ready to boil over, adding
more fire could only end in more tragedy and loss of life on both sides.
Personally
I worry for my country. I believe that crime, especially violent
crime is being allowed to run unchecked to encourage the people to
erroneously choose a suspension of human rights and civil liberties
as an option, ignoring Benjamin Franklin's admonishing that
'those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary safety deserve neither and will eventually lose both.'
There is nothing good down this road that we are on but the
concentration of all power into one man's hands and this must never
be allowed to occur, especially in a time when people all over the
world are literally dying to wrest power back from similar self
imposed strong men. Students of history know that it is not
so much those who facilitate wrong that are most to blame, but
those who have the power to prevent it and sit idly by and let it
happen. An informed and active electorate is more powerful than
anything in the maintenance of a democracy, and it is time our people
moved from the sidelines of voting (maybe) every five years and
getting more actively involved in the decisions that are being made
on their behalf.
If
I am wrong then surely we could lose little by deepening our
democracy and empowering our people. But what if I'm right?

Phillip boy, I've been reading up on Seligman's "Learned helplessness" and I can see how it aptly applies on the Rock.
ReplyDelete